naked / default rider 183 cm
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR ergonomics
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z | MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,344 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 174 kg | - |
| Displacement | 373 cc | 1,078 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Sport (61.4 deg)
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Neutral (94.1 deg)
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Neutral (11.1 deg)
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (12.3 deg)