enduro / default rider 183 cm
Beta Motor 200 RR vs Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 ergonomics
Beta Motor 200 RR and Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Beta Motor 200 RR
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Beta Motor 200 RR | Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 930 mm | 930 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,476 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 190 cc | 350 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
- Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Neutral (12.4 deg)
- Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
- Neutral (12.5 deg)